The problem

Category research goes stale on contact

The usual category study is two weeks of tab-hopping — app listings, review pages, pricing screenshots, LinkedIn — compressed into a deck that starts decaying the day it ships. Six weeks later someone asks “is this still true?” and nobody knows.

The fix isn’t a bigger deck. It’s doing the research inside a system that keeps watching the category after you stop.

The workflow

From category name to living analysis

Four passes over the same public record, each one sharper.

  1. 1

    Map the category

    Start from the app directory scoped to a category: who competes, how they price, how reviews are distributed, which developers are behind multiple entrants, and what launched recently.

  2. 2

    Read the merchant complaints

    A Market Voice scope across the category leaders clusters up to 24 months of public reviews into pain and praise themes — the closest public proxy for “what would make merchants switch.”

  3. 3

    Watch how the leaders iterate

    Change Intelligence shows each leader’s listing history: pricing experiments, repositioning, feature claims. How often and in what direction a leader iterates is strategy you can read.

  4. 4

    Package the findings

    Save the competitive set and notable brands to lists, export the segments to CSV, and keep following the category so the research stays alive after the memo ships.

Accurate data

Research-grade and citable

Everything here is public-signal research: listings, reviews, launches, detected stacks. Detected installs are near-perfectly accurate, and every field is labeled by provenance — observed, detected, or inferred — so a memo can cite it with confidence. The full contract is in the data methodology.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Get started

Study your next category inside the data.

Map the competitors, read the review themes, and keep the analysis alive with follows.

Start freeSee pricingFree plan available.